In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-6950X is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-6950X
No clear advantages
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6950X vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6950X
May 31st, 2016
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6950X May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $1,723.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
