Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1619 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i7-6900K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $125.00 vs $294.95
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.68 vs $1.45 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6900K - 203 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
183
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7029 minutes ago
Buy for $294.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7029 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |