In Rust, the Core i7-6900K is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $193 more expensive!
Core i7-6900K
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 12% faster in Rust – 254 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 67% cheaper – $96.99 vs $289.95
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Rust – $0.38 vs $1.27/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 58 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-6900K vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
227 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
74%
Price, $
$289.95
33%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
30%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6900K May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $1,089.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
