The Core i7-6850K is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900F, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $406.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-6850K
- Up to 85% cheaper – $69.00 vs $475.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 12 threads
Core i7-6850K vs Core i9-13900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6850K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
183
85%
Min 1% FPS
122
86%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
216
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$475
14%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
17%
Core i7-6850K vs Core i9-13900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6850K vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6850K vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6850K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
15 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6850K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$617.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Broadwell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
140 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
15 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |