In Atomfall, the Core i7-6800K is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $131 more expensive!
Core i7-6800K
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 57% cheaper – $96.99 vs $228.02
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $1.09/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 58 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-6800K vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
209 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
91%
Price, $
$228.02
42%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
38%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6800K vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6800K vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6800K May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $434.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
