The Core i7-6700TE is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-6700TE
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
The Core i7-6700TE is better in every way
Core i7-6700TE vs Celeron G3930 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700TE
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
170
96%
Min 1% FPS
114
97%
Price, $
$70.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700TE vs Celeron G3930 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700TE vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700TE vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700TE
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700TE | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |