In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-6700T is slightly slower than the Xeon X3440. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-6700T
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3440
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Xeon X3440: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
178 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
89%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Xeon X3440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Xeon X3440 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon X3440
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3440 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $215.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
