In Atomfall, the Core i7-6700T is slightly faster than the FX-8370 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $173 cheaper!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 months and 29 days newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 11 months and 29 days newer
- Up to 69% cheaper – $79.00 vs $252.02
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall – $0.38 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8370
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
191 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
93%
Price, $
$252.02
31%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
29%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
