In Deathloop, the Core i7-6700T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 225. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $164 cheaper!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 67% cheaper – $79.00 vs $242.76
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Deathloop – $0.36 vs $1.02/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 5 225
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core Ultra 5 225: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
92%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 225
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
178 FPS
100%
Price, $
$242.76
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
35%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core Ultra 5 225 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core Ultra 5 225 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 5 225
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 225 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $246.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
