In Atomfall, the Core i7-6700T is slower than the Core i9-14900KS. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $621 cheaper!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 89% cheaper – $79.00 vs $699.99
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in Atomfall – $0.38 vs $2.79/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 35 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Core i9-14900KS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 250 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Mar 14, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i9-14900KS: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
205 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
82%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$699.99
11%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i9-14900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i9-14900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KS Mar 14th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Mar 14th, 2024 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $689.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
