In Rust, the Core i7-6700T is slightly faster than the Core i7-2820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 220 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-2820QM
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i7-2820QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i7-2820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i7-2820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
