In Control, the Core i7-6700T is same performance as the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $41 cheaper!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 34% cheaper – $79.00 vs $119.99
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Control – $0.31 vs $0.48/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
65%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
