The Core i7-6700T is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-8600T, however, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $22.94 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- Up to 19% cheaper – $99.60 vs $122.54
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-8600T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-8600T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
182
99%
Min 1% FPS
121
99%
Price, $
$99.6
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i5-8600T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, $
$122.54
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
82%
Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-8600T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-8600T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-8600T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i5-8600T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-8600T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |