The Core i7-6700T is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-4440 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $106.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 57% cheaper – $79.00 vs $185.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-4440
The Core i7-6700T is better in every way
Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-4440 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
110
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-4440 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-4440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-4440 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-4440
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
$303.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
35 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |