In Deathloop, the Core i7-6700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 231 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
95%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
