In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-6700T is slightly slower than the Core i3-6100 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $8 more expensive!
Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i3-6100
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 180 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 11% cheaper – $70.65 vs $79.00
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.39 vs $0.44/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
179 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
99%
Price, $
$79
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
89%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
