In Rust, the Core i7-6700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M and it's also a better value for money, as it's $20 cheaper!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 221 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 20% cheaper – $79.00 vs $98.95
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Rust – $0.35 vs $0.47/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Rust
Core i3-330M
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
39 FPS
76%
Price, $
$98.95
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
74%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
