In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-6700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $71 cheaper!
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 178 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 47% cheaper – $79.00 vs $149.94
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 48% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.44 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 48% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
178 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
175 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
98%
Price, $
$149.94
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
52%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
