The Core i7-6700K is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 2400G and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $2.40 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 2% cheaper – $135.00 vs $137.40
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 65 vs 91 Watts
Core i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 2400G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$137.4
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 2400G
Feb 12th, 2018
Average FPS
178
95%
Min 1% FPS
119
96%
Price, $
$135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
97%
Core i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 2400G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 2400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 2400G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Ryzen 5 2400G
Feb 12th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| $339.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| 91 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
