The Core i7-6700 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Phenom X4 9650, however, it's the same value for money, as it's $86.94 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 81% cheaper – $19.95 vs $106.89
Core i7-6700 vs Phenom X4 9650 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, $
$106.89
18%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
21%
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
89%
Min 1% FPS
110
90%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700 vs Phenom X4 9650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700 vs Phenom X4 9650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700 vs Phenom X4 9650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
$303.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Skylake | Codename | Agena |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | unknown |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |