Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3030 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $110.20 vs $433.00
- Up to 71% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-14900K - $0.43 vs $1.50 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-6700 - 289 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
256
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $110.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6657 minutes ago
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6656 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |