In Deathloop, the Core i7-640M is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 28 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 14 years and 28 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-640M vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-640M vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-640M vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
17%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$346.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
