In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-640M is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-640M
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 245 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-640M vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
223 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
91%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-640M vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-640M vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
