In Atomfall, the Core i7-640M is slower than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 13 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-640M vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-640M vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-640M vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
