The Core i7-640LM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-2400S. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 25 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-2400S
- A much faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-640LM vs Core i5-2400S for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-640LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
165
98%
Min 1% FPS
111
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
168
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, $
$11.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Core i7-640LM vs Core i5-2400S in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-640LM vs Core i5-2400S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-640LM vs Core i5-2400S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-640LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.13 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
2.93 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-640LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
25 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
