In Atomfall, the Core i7-620M is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 months and 7 days newer – Mar 16, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 months and 7 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
