In Atomfall, the Core i7-620M is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2665. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 35 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2665
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Xeon E5-2665: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Xeon E5-2665 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Xeon E5-2665 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2665
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2665 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35W | Power Consumption | 115W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
