In Control, the Core i7-620M is same performance as the Xeon E3-1270. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1270
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Apr 03, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Xeon E3-1270: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Xeon E3-1270 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Xeon E3-1270 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1270
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1270 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
