In Dead Space, the Core i7-620M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space – 185 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
185 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
104 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
19%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
