In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i7-620M is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 5 225. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 5 225
- Up to 56% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 161 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 56% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 15 years newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 15 years newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core Ultra 5 225: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 225
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
161 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
117 FPS
100%
Price, $
$242.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core Ultra 5 225 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core Ultra 5 225 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
17%
Core Ultra 5 225
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 225 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $246.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
