In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i7-620M is slightly faster than the Core i9-7980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 6% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 263 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7980XE
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i9-7980XE: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i9-7980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i9-7980XE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
11%
L3 Cache
4 MB
16%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i9-7980XE
Sep 1st, 2017
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7980XE Sep 1st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Sep 1st, 2017 |
$332.00 | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
