In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-620M is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 34% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 125 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$332.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
