In Atomfall, the Core i7-620M is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$137.66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
