In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-620M is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-11700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-11700K
- Up to 67% faster in Battlefield 6 – 102 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 67% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i7-11700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-11700K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
102 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
76 FPS
100%
Price, $
$324.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-11700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-11700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
33%
Core i7-11700K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$332.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
