In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-620M is faster than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
172 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
84%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
36%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
