In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-620M is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 244 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Is 9 years newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
225 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
92%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
