The Core i7-620M is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-3450
- A much faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-620M vs Core i5-3450 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
167
98%
Min 1% FPS
112
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Core i7-620M vs Core i5-3450 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.67 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $174.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
