In F1 22, the Core i7-620M is slightly faster than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 4% faster in F1 22 – 375 vs 361 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in F1 22
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
F1 22 FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
