In Atomfall, the Core i7-620M is slower than the Core i5-11600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 227 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
33%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $237.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
