The Core i7-620M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-14100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i7-620M vs Core i3-14100
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
181
80%
Min 1% FPS
125
81%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
226
100%
Min 1% FPS
154
100%
Price, $
$136.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-14100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
