In Atomfall, the Core i7-620M is slightly faster than the Celeron 2955U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 186 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Celeron 2955U
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 15 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Celeron 2955U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Celeron 2955U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Celeron 2955U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Celeron 2955U
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 2955U Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 35W | Power Consumption | 15W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
