In Deathloop, the Core i7-620M is slightly slower than the Celeron 1037U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
No clear advantages
Celeron 1037U
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 13 days newer – Jan 20, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 13 days newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Celeron 1037U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Celeron 1037U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Celeron 1037U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Celeron 1037U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 1037U Jan 20th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
