The Core i7-620LM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-9700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 25 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-9700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-9700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
88%
Min 1% FPS
112
90%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$210.54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-9700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-9700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-9700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$300.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
25 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
