In Rust, the Core i7-5960X is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $33 cheaper!
Core i7-5960X
- Up to 11% cheaper – $255.05 vs $288.00
- Up to 11% cheaper
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 25% faster in Rust – 278 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 10% better value in Rust – $1.03 vs $1.14/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-5960X vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
223 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
58%
Price, $
$255.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
90%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5960X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5960X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5960X Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
