In Atomfall, the Core i7-5960X is slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $221 cheaper!
Core i7-5960X
- Up to 46% cheaper – $255.05 vs $476.00
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall – $1.23 vs $1.94/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5960X vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
207 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
84%
Price, $
$255.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
53%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
63%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5960X vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5960X vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5960X Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
