In Deathloop, the Core i7-5960X is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $48 cheaper!
Core i7-5960X
- Up to 16% cheaper – $255.05 vs $302.97
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Deathloop – $1.16 vs $1.26/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Deathloop
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 239 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-5960X vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
92%
Price, $
$255.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
84%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
92%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5960X vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5960X vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
20 MB
61%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
65%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5960X Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
