Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-5960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5960X.
Advantages of Core i7-5960X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $235.05 vs $849.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - $0.43 vs $1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-5960X - 672 vs 542 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
542
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $235.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7296 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
34%
Price, $
$849.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7294 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5960X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |