In Atomfall, the Core i7-5960X is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $158 more expensive!
Core i7-5960X
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 62% cheaper – $96.99 vs $255.05
- Up to 62% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $1.23/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 58 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5960X vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
207 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
90%
Price, $
$255.05
38%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
33%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5960X vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5960X vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5960X Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
