In Atomfall, the Core i7-5930K is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $130 cheaper!
Core i7-5930K
- Up to 43% cheaper – $169.00 vs $298.98
- Up to 43% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall – $0.81 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5930K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
207 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
83%
Price, $
$169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
56%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
68%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5930K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5930K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
15 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5930K Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
