In Deathloop, the Core i7-5930K is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $117 cheaper!
Core i7-5930K
- Up to 41% cheaper – $169.00 vs $286.00
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Deathloop – $0.77 vs $1.18/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Deathloop
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-5930K vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
91%
Price, $
$169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$286
59%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
65%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5930K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5930K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
15 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5930K Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
